What's new
Runion

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

batbatch

proxy

Midle Weight
Депозит
$0
Untitled.png




ibb.co


Untitled hosted at ImgBB

Image Untitled hosted in ImgBB
ibb.co

ibb.co

Если это .reg exploit то я Админ форма . С каких пор добавление в авторан считается експлойтом?
Дайте бан.
 
admin сказал(а):
Истец прав. Добавление в авторан уж никак не является эксплойтом. Это рекламный трюк и это нужно исправить.
batbatch, прошу сделать возврат клиенту в размере 45$ в течении 24 часов.

Applicant is right. Adding to the autorun is not an exploit. It is a publicity stunt and needs to be fixed.
batbatch, please refund the customer $45 within 24 hours.
Нажмите, чтобы раскрыть...
I don’t get why it is a publicity stunt. The startup is just an stage for the whole process. It is not add to startup and call it the day. that’s how the process is called. Same way around with .lnk exploit. it’s called .lnk exploit. Here, in bf, in malware analysis reports, everywhere. I’m sure there is a mistake here, the snippet the applicant sent is part of the code, not the whole code. About the money, the $45 were for a crypt, a normal crypt, not for the .reg “exploit”. Crypt works just fine, I tested it, and I have the avcheck.net scanner.to results which indicate exactly what I sell. Again, he did not paid full price. He did not paid for the $50 .reg file, which is fine. But the $45 belong to a crypt ( has nothing to do with the screenshots he provided ) and it’s working exactly as I advertised . If you want to see the conversation I can provide the screenshots. I do suggest you ask him about the crypt he paid half the price for and received. He can do the scans himself and proof that it works. I did not scammed anyone here, actually, I am the one losing money. Please admin, take the crypt, that he paid for, which I provided 100% working as consideration. The .reg was actually free. Not free but he directly didn’t paid for it. I will not refund something he did not even paid for, makes no sense.
 
batbatch сказал(а):
Can you refund from my deposit? Also I don’t get why it is a publicity stunt. The startup is just an stage for the whole process. It is not add to startup and call it the day. that’s how the process is called. Same way around with .lnk exploit. It’s just adding a file to a url and masking as .lnk. But it’s called .lnk exploit. Here, in bf, in malware analysis reports, everywhere. I’m sure there is a mistake here, the snippet the applicant sent is part of the code, not the whole code. About the money, the $45 where for a crypt, a normal crypt, not for the .reg “exploit”. Crypt works just fine, I tested it, and I have the avcheck.net scanner.to results which indicate exactly what I sell. Again, he did not paid full price. He did not paid for the $50 .reg file, which is fine. But the $45 belong to a crypt ( has nothing to do with the screenshots he provided ) and it’s working exactly as I advised. If you want to see the conversation I can provide the screenshots.
Нажмите, чтобы раскрыть...
No, it is not possible to refund from a deposit. A deposit is not a balance. You can only add and withdraw deposit.
 
admin сказал(а):
No, it is not possible to refund from a deposit. A deposit is not a balance. You can only add and withdraw deposit.
Нажмите, чтобы раскрыть...
It’s okay, but again, he received a fully working crypted stub, what he paid for. The .reg was given for free, not because it was free but because he decided not to pay. Which is fine, but the crypt is working perfectly fine, and crypt has nothing to do with .reg….

I
batbatch сказал(а):
It’s okay, but again, he received a fully working crypted stub, what he paid for. The .reg was given for free, not because it was free but because he decided not to pay. Which is fine, but the crypt is working perfectly fine, and crypt has nothing to do with .reg….
Нажмите, чтобы раскрыть...
ll take down the .reg thread if it’s considered publicity stunt. No problem with that, but the $45 do not belong to the .reg
 
I’m pretty sure who purchased this from me. I had a hard time with this client due to the lack of communication from his side. I’ll begin by saying, It’s funny that he is asking for ban or refund, mainly because I gave him a $75 fully working crypt for only $45 ( He said he would pay the rest, he did not ), I also gave him a $50 reg file which he again, did not paid for. In terms of the exploit, this client has 0 to no experience with registry, which is understandable and I tried my best to explain the functionality. Yes, the file gets added to startup, and startup is indeed not an exploit. But since this client was so egocentric and closed to what I was telling, I’ll explain the whole .reg process here. It is indeed an exploit mainly because it: bypasses uac, bypasses message prompt (spoof) and silently loads payload into windows registry. That’s the process that runs “under the hood” before showing the startup file you are complaining about. To conclude, this client owes me $30 for a crypt ( which of course he did not talk about, odd ) and $50 for the .reg exploit. I did not bother on insisting, neither should he. Hope you admins can understand the situation. I’m sure who I am talking about cause he is the only buyer I’ve had. I already have screenshots from our conversation in telegram, in case admins require further information. I am eager to clear this out and therefore clean my name. Thank you admin.
 
Истец прав. Добавление в авторан уж никак не является эксплойтом. Это рекламный трюк и это нужно исправить.
batbatch, прошу сделать возврат клиенту в размере 45$ в течении 24 часов.

Applicant is right. Adding to the autorun is not an exploit. It is a publicity stunt and needs to be fixed.
batbatch, please refund the customer $45 within 24 hours.
 
Top